Papers with automated algorithms
AutoAlign: Get Your LLM Aligned with Minimal Annotations (2025.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyu Lu, Dong Xu, Chunkang Zhang, Xinyan Guan, Junxiang Wang, Qingyu Zhang, Pengbo Wang, Yingzhi Mao, Hao Xiang, Xueru Wen, Zichao Li, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Le Sun, Xianpei Han
| Challenge: | Automated Alignment (ALM) is a set of algorithms designed to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intentions and values while minimizing manual intervention. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source toolkit that integrates mainstream automated algorithms through a consistent interface and an accessible workflow supporting one-click execution for prompt synthesis and automatic alignment signal construction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables easy reproduction of existing results through extensive benchmarks and facilitates the development of novel approaches via modular components. |
HEIDL: Learning Linguistic Expressions with Deep Learning and Human-in-the-Loop (P19-3)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | HITL-ML approaches are too low-level and far-removed from human’s conceptual models. |
| Approach: | They propose a prototype HITL-ML system that exposes the machine-learned model through high-level, explainable linguistic expressions formed of predicates representing semantic structure of text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system exposes the machine-learned model through high-level, explainable linguistic expressions formed of predicates representing semantic structure of text. |
Not What the Doctor Ordered: Surveying LLM-based De-identification and Quantifying Clinical Information Loss (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Kiana Aghakasiri, Noopur Zambare, JoAnn Thai, Carrie Ye, Mayur Mehta, J Ross Mitchell, Mohamed Abdalla
| Challenge: | De-identification is an application of NLP where automated algorithms remove identifying information of patients and providers. |
| Approach: | They propose to use generative large language models to de-identify patients and providers . they propose to validate existing metrics to quantify extent of inappropriate removal . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on a survey of LLM-based de-identification research . it shows that the models perform poorly in identifying clinically relevant changes . |